It does not tell you that your opening lost you those games. What it measures is where a game stood at one move number and how that game finished — and those two things being related is not evidence that one caused the other. An early tactic, the strength of the opponent, the clock and the next thirty moves are all still candidates, and none of them is visible from here.
So the report reports. It says how many games reached the checkpoint worse and what you scored from them, and then it points at specific moves you can check yourself on a board. Deciding whether the repertoire is the problem is your call, and the evidence for it is on the page rather than compressed into a verdict.
The evaluations behind it are a survey depth, picked so several hundred positions fit into a few minutes on your own machine. Individual moves can and do change when they are searched further, which is why any single move in the report can be re-checked deeper before you act on it.